🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure persona of the president. This figure is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show released last October, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from disorder. Although he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this identical story instead of debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, the president is shown as having been chosen by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with him to take the job. The presidency was in essence a casting call with many contenders. Central to this process stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who expected to run the state in practice.

• The shortlist featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who studied his rise, the future president merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the process said the primary requirement was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier version prompted Russian media and online audiences to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with his appeared on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. His influence is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it might seek to examine.