🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.